Single judge order in a contempt application where the petitioner informed the Court that an earlier order was complied with via payment. The petition was disposed of as satisfied without detailed reasoning.
Contempt petition disposed of as satisfied due to compliance with the earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~55
Through: Ms. Esha Mazumdar, Advocate. Mob: 9873109672
versus
SURENDRA KUMAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Dr. S.S Hooda, Advocate for CAG. Mob: 9868280166 Mr. Jatin Singh, Mr. Keshav Sehgal, Mr. Shivam Gaur, Mr. Kshitij Joshi and Mr. Aryan Kuamr, Advocates for R-2. Mob: 9999989899
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 09.02.2024 CM APPL. 7965/2024
CONT.CAS(C) 237/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:24:30
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
FEBRUARY 9, 2024 ak
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:24:30
Neerja Pant
Surendra Kumar
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
