Delhi HC held there was no willful disobedience of the order dated 13.10.2015 as it contained no specific directive on permanent status or increments. Contempt petition dismissed.
Petition for contempt dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
Through: Mr. Sriram P., Ms. Anjali & Ms. Isha,
versus
PROF DR M B GAUR ..... Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam & Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. M: 9313964463
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
CM APPL. 382/2024 (For exemption)
CONT.CAS(C) 19/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:26:34
th 8. The order dated 13 October, 2015 in W.P.(C) No. 8000/2014 , of which compliance is sought, reads as under:
“The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief:-
“issue a writ of mandamus or certiorari or any other writ or direction directing the respondents to treat the petitioner as having been appointed on regular basis to the post to which the petitioner has been selected and appointed”.
Learned counsel for the respondents has placed before me an order dated February 16, 2015 issued by the Service Department of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi wherein it has been communicated to all the concerned that in view of the existing policy regarding status of contractual employees engaged in various departments and organizations under the Government, their services
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:26:34
shall not be terminated till further instructions in the matter. He also states, that these shall also be applicable to the organization in question i.e Ch. Brahm Prakash Ayurved Charak Sansthan and the services of the petitioner shall not be terminated till further instructions. The said statement of the learned counsel is taken on record. It is made clear, if a decision is taken by the respondents to terminate the services of the petitioner, they shall give a notice to the petitioner of at least two weeks before effecting termination. It is expected, petitioner shall be granted the same benefits. The petition is disposed of in terms of the above. xxx xxx xxx”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:26:34
substantive writ petition filed by the petitioner.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
JANUARY 25, 2024/kr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:26:34
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there was willful disobedience of the order dated 13 October 2015.
Whether the Court can pass directions outside the four corners of the impugned order in contempt proceedings.
Smita Arora
Prof Dr M B Gaur
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
