Disposed

Shiv Kumar v. Subhasish Panda

Delhi HC21 Nov 2024CONT.CAS(C)/1843/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner alleged non-compliance with Division Bench directions requiring a speaking-order decision on his representation within four weeks. Respondent-DDA stated the representation was decided on 10.09.2024 and undertook to share the decision. Petition not pressed; disposed of with liberty.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as not pressed; liberty granted to petitioner to take further action as permissible under law if required.

Shiv Kumar Vs Subhasish Panda — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~119

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1843/2024 & CM APPL. 67784/2024 SHIV KUMAR

¶4

.....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Nagender Vashisht, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

SUBHASISH PANDA

¶8

.....Respondent Through: Mrs. Mrinalini Sen, SC along with Ms. Shivangi Bhasin and Ms. Gauri Shyam, Advocates for DDA.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

% 21.11.2024

¶13

The grievance raised by the petitioner is very precise.

¶14

It is submitted that despite there being specific directions passed by learned Division Bench on 18.12.2023 in W.P.(C) No. 16279/20223, his representation, which was required to be decided within a period of four weeks by way of a speaking order, has not yet been decided.

¶15

Ms. Sen, learned counsel for respondent-DDA appears on advance notice and submits that because of the complex nature of the matter, there was some delay in deciding the representation but fact remains that the representation has already been decided on 10.09.2024.

¶16

Learned counsel for respondent-DDA undertakes to transmit the copy of such decision to this Court through e-mail as well as to the designated e-mail of learned counsel for the petitioner, during the course of the day.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the above, he does not press this petition anymore and after going through the above said

¶18

CONT.CAS(C) 1843/2024 1

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/11/2024 at 14:19:41

¶20

decision taken by the concerned Authority, the petitioner would, if required, take further appropriate action as permissible under law.

¶21

The petition stands disposed of as not pressed. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

¶22

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶23

NOVEMBER 21, 2024/ sw

¶24

CONT.CAS(C) 1843/2024 2

¶25

Shiv Kumar v. Subhasish Panda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Kumar v. Subhasish Panda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shfiqur Rahman Kidwai Association and Another Jamia Millia Islamia Vs Prof Nazim Husain Al- Jafri

Dilip Kumar Vs Sh. Ajay Kumar Bhalla & Ors.

Rajnesh Vs Gyanesh Bharti IAS & Ors.

Vipin Kumar Gupta Vs Shri Krishna Mohan Uppu & Anr.

Jeet Kumar Sohra Vs Office of the Principal District and Sessions Judge Head Quarters

Siddhartha Mukherjee Vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited and Ors.

Anil Dutt Sharma Vs Rahul Mehra & Ors.

Yogita Vs Krishan (Vikash)

M/S Tdi Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Vikram Barwal & Ors.

M/S Cannes Property Management Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Vikram Barwal and Ors.

Shfiqur Rahman Kidwai Association and Another Jamia Millia Islamia Vs Prof Nazim Husain Al- Jafri

Feku Prasad & Ors. Vs Vice Chairman, Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Dor Welfare Foundation Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sushma Tanwar Vs Ms Mahima Madan & Anr.