Contempt petition concerning an order dated 27.05.2024. The respondents' counsel stated the competent authority would pass a fresh order after hearing the petitioner. The court directed that the impugned order not be acted upon and that respondents afford a fresh hearing and pass a reasoned order within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~108
DR POONAM GAUR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Esha Mazumdar, Ms. Unni Maya S., Mr. Ishan Singh, Advs.
versus
ASHOK KUMAR CHAIRPERSON SCERT EDUCATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel-SCERT with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA O R D E R % 04.10.2024
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
OCTOBER 04, 2024 sp
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/10/2024 at 15:48:26
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order passed without hearing the petitioner should be kept in abeyance and a fresh hearing granted?
Dr Poonam Gaur
Ashok Kumar Chairperson SCERT
Others
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
