Dismissed

Omar International v. Salman Latif and Anr.

Delhi HC5 Sept 2024CONT.CAS(C)/1407/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order addressed two applications. In CM appl. 51525/2024, the Delhi HC condoned a delay of 118 days in re-filing the contempt case in CM appl. 51526/2024 and disposed of the delay application. Subsequently, the main contempt petition was dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice after the petitioner sought to withdraw it. The petitioner had sought initiation of proceedings regarding dishonoure

What did the court decide?

Delay of 118 days was condoned; contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice.

Omar International Vs Salman Latif and Anr. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~77

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1407/2024

¶4

OMAR INTERNATIONAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Asad Alvi, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

SALMAN LATIF AND ANR .....Respondents

¶7

Through: None.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R % 05.09.2024

¶11

CM APPL. 51525/2024 (Ex.)

¶12

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 51526/2024 (Delay of 118 days in re-filing the present contempt petition)

¶14

This application has been moved on behalf of the petitioner for condonation of delay of 118 days in re-filing the present contempt petition.

¶15

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and delay of 118 days in re-filing the present contempt petition is condoned.

¶16

The application stands disposed of.

¶17

CONT.CAS(C) 1407/2024

¶18

The petitioner is seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent No.2/contemnor for the wilful disobedience of his undertaking given and recorded by the Court on 28.08.2018,

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2024 at 14:23:56

¶21

passed in Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 1499/2018.

¶22

None appeared on behalf of the respondents despite sending advance notice.

¶23

Evidently, in pursuance of the aforesaid undertaking, five cheques each of the sum of Rs. 25 lakhs were issued by the respondent No.2/Contemnor. It is the case of the petitioner that only one cheque bearing No. 00022 dated 28.08.2018, was presented for encashment which was dishonoured on representation on 12.11.2018. The present petition appears to be barred by limitation.

¶24

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner requests permission to withdraw the present CONT CAS(C) and pursue appropriate remedies in law.

¶25

The same is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudiced.

¶26

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

¶27

SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 sp

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2024 at 14:23:56

Omar International v. Salman Latif and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Omar International v. Salman Latif and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satya Pal Lamba Vs Sh Ved Prakash Lamba

Smt. Aditi Gaur Vs Shri Sumit Khandelwal, General Manager, Uco Bank

Geetanjali Vs Mr. Mohit Singhal & Ors.

Dr. Umesh Chandra Sharma Vs Smt Alka Upadhyay & Ors.

Goyal Mg Gases Private Limited Vs Nepc India Private Limited and Others & Ors.

Goyal Mg Gases Private Limited Vs Nepc India Limited and Others & Ors.

Delhi Goods Transport Association Vs Delhi Development Authority

Morgan Ventures Limited Vs Nepc India Limited and Other & Ors.

Satya Pal Lamba Vs Sh Ved Prakash Lamba

Smt. Aditi Gaur Vs Shri Sumit Khandelwal, General Manager, Uco Bank

Geetanjali Vs Mr. Mohit Singhal & Ors.

Ajay Khanna Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Manjesh Singh Vs Special Task Force DDA & Ors.

Radhe Shyam Vs Shri Govind Mohan & Ors.