Disposed

Madhu Keny v. Rajesh Aggarwal & Ors.

Delhi HC30 Jan 2024CONT.CAS(C)/1384/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a writ order directing restoration of provisional pension. Counsel for the petitioner stated the order had been complied with and did not press the petition, reserving liberty to challenge any departmental action in independent proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as not pressed with liberty to pursue independent legal proceedings on remaining disputes.

Madhu Keny Vs Rajesh Aggarwal & Ors. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~33

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1384/2022

¶4

MADHU KENY ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr Tushar Ranjan Mohanty, Ms Payal Mohanty, Ms Soumya Punna and Mr Milind Jain, Advs

¶6

versus

¶7

RAJESH AGGARWAL & ORS. ..... Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal & Mr. Nitin Chandra, Advs. for UOI. M: 8378007384

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶11

O R D E R % 30.01.2024

¶12

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that order dated 22^nd August, 2022 passed in W.P.(C) No. 13102/2021 has been complied with. He further submits that in terms of the said order, the respondents had been directed to restore the payment of provisional pension to the petitioner and arrears thereof, w.e.f. from 5^th November, 2021 within two months, subject to any further action as per the Rules, which may be taken against the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four months.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner qua the said action initiated by the respondents, shall be raised in independent proceedings. Accordingly he submits that he does not wish to

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/08/2024 at 12:41:56

¶15

press the present contempt petition any further.

¶16

In view of the aforesaid, the present contempt petition is disposed of as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioner to initiate appropriate legal proceedings qua other disputes with respect to any action that may be taken by the respondent against the petitioner.

¶17

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶18

JANUARY 30, 2024/kr

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/08/2024 at 12:41:56

Madhu Keny v. Rajesh Aggarwal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhu Keny v. Rajesh Aggarwal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gagan Vs Sh. Anish Dayal Singh & Ors.

Aparajita Kumar Vs Karthik Jayaraman

New Delhi Nature Society Vs Sh. Rajesh Bansal & Ors.

Kamla Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Shailesh Kumar Jha Vs Union of India & Ors.

Surinder Singh Vs Ajay Kumar Bhalla and Anr.

De Lage Landen Financial Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Binayak Nursing Home Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Meenakshi Khare & Ors. Vs Himanshu Gupta IAS & Ors.

Gagan Vs Sh. Anish Dayal Singh & Ors.

Aparajita Kumar Vs Karthik Jayaraman

New Delhi Nature Society Vs Sh. Rajesh Bansal & Ors.

Pardeep through His Mother Smt. Savitri Vs Delhi Development Authority

Syed Mohd Noorullah Vs Sh Krishan Kumar Registrar of Co. Operative Societies and Anr.

Annwesha Deb Vs Dslsa through Memeber Secretary Mukesh Kumar Gupta