Dismissed

Ajay Singh Kotwal v. Atul Kumar Goel and Ors.

Delhi HC2 Sept 2024CONT.CAS(C)/1380/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought contempt for non-compliance of a writ direction to pass a speaking order on his representation. The respondent bank produced the speaking order dated 20.08.2024, which was supplied to the petitioner in court; the petitioner sought withdrawal with liberty to challenge it.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal as withdrawn with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings against the impugned order.

Ajay Singh Kotwal Vs Atul Kumar Goel and Ors. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~93

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1380/2024

¶4

AJAY SINGH KOTWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

ATUL KUMAR GOEL AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Mr. Anant Gautam, Mr Dinesh Sharma, Mr. Kushagra Nilesh Sahay, Ms. Likivi & Ms. Kavitoli, Advs. for respondent/Bank

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA

¶8

O R D E R % 02.09.2024

¶9

The petitioner is seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for the wilful disobedience of the directions contained in order dated 01.05.2024 in W.P.(C) 5290/2024. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent/Bank is present on advance notice.

¶10

In short, the representation of the petitioner was directed to be considered by the Competent Authority by passing a speaking order in accordance with the law within eight weeks.

¶11

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent present on advance notice submits that, in terms of the directions of this Court, a speaking order has been passed on 20.08.2024 and the petitioner has since been intimated about the same.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the copy of the

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/09/2024 at 12:21:13

¶15

order has not been supplied. Hard copy of the same is placed on the record and a copy of the same is supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner in the court.

¶16

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner requests permission to withdraw the present petition with the liberty to institute appropriate proceedings in case the petitioner is aggrieved against the impugned order.

¶17

The Registry is directed to digitize the reply and be placed on the record.

¶18

The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty so sought.

¶19

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

¶20

SEPTEMBER 2, 2024/sa

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/09/2024 at 12:21:13

Ajay Singh Kotwal v. Atul Kumar Goel and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Singh Kotwal v. Atul Kumar Goel and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amreen Khan Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Bimla Sachdev Vs Subur & Anr.

North Delhi Municipal Corporation Thr Its Commissioner Vs Akram Khan

Dimple Vs Ajay Kumar Bhalla & Ors.

Bhumika Khurana Vs Sumit Chopra

Bolt Technology Ou Vs Ujoy Technology Private Limited & Ors.

Devi Lal Garg Vs Baldev Singh

Dr. Umesh Chandra Sharma Vs Smt Alka Upadhyay & Ors.

Amreen Khan Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Bimla Sachdev Vs Subur & Anr.

North Delhi Municipal Corporation Thr Its Commissioner Vs Akram Khan

Puja Thareja @ Puja Airy Vs State Bank of India & Ors.

Dr Shamima Akhtar Vs Dr Asif Iqbal

Amar Singh & Anr. Vs Allahabad Bank