The Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience. As the respondent had already taken a decision dismissing the petitioner's application, the impugned direction had been complied with, rendering the petition not maintainable.
Contempt petition dismissed with liberty to seek separate relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~83
M/S SHRI VAISHNAVI ITERNATIONAL .....Petitioner Through: None.
versus
MS. CHANCHAL YADAV .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Aggarwa, ASC with Mr. Shubham Goel & Mr. Mayank Kamra, Advs. Mr. Atul Sharma, Ms. Abhilasha Sharma & Mr. Dipan Sethi, Advs. for R1/RBI
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
O R D E R % 11.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:16:25
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024/sa
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:16:25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of directions is maintainable.
M/S SHRI VAISHNAVI ITERNATIONAL
MS. CHANCHAL YADAV
DHARMESH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
