The court noted the petitioner failed to deposit the imposed cost of ₹10,000 and directed the matter to a registrar for issuing a notice to realise the amount.
Direction to Joint Registrar to issue notice to petitioner through SHO for realisation of unpaid cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~128
SHRI ASHOK KUMAR TANEJA .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
SHRI ASHWANI KUMAR COMMISSIONER MCD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
O R D E R % 09.10.2024
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
OCTOBER 9, 2024 Ch/Sa
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2024 at 12:00:31
SHRI ASHOK KUMAR TANEJA
SHRI ASHWANI KUMAR COMMISSIONER MCD
DHARMESH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
