In a judicial contempt petition, the petitioner counsel submitted that the matter is not being pursued due to pending CM applications in the principal writ petition. The court consequently disposed of the contempt petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
MANISH CHAWLA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Prakash Gautam, Advocate (Through VC)
versus
ASHWINI KUMAR AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for MCD with Ms. Shweta Singh, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 20.12.2024
MANOJ JAIN, J
DECEMBER 20, 2024/dr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:05:51
Manish Chawla
Ashwini Kumar
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
