Allowed

Sahib Singh v. T P Singh & Ors.

Delhi HC2 May 2024CONT.CAS(C)/1092/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged willful disobedience order regarding suspension period and retiral benefits. Respondents filed compliance affidavit showing full payment of arrear, gratuity, leave salary, and other dues. Court found compliance satisfied and disposed petition granting liberty for future claims.

What did the court decide?

The petition was disposed of as satisfied, with liberty granted to the petitioner to agitate claims for any further dues if admissible.

Sahib Singh Vs T P Singh & Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~101

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1092/2019

¶4

SAHIB SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. (M): 9818153010 Email: [email protected]

¶5

versus

¶6

T P SINGH & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, SPC with Mr. Rahul Kumar Sharma, Ms. Mishika, Advocates with Mr. Nakul Kumar, Inspector RPP Delhi. (M): 9760039403 Email: [email protected]

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶8

O R D E R % 02.05.2024

¶9

The present petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 23^rd August, 2019 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No. 9055/2018 .

¶10

By way of the aforesaid order, the writ petition filed by the petitioner was allowed and the respondents were directed to take the period of suspension of the petitioner from 20^th September, 1984 to 24^th August, 1994, as the period spent on duty. The respondents were further directed to calculate the retiral benefits of the petitioner, including his last drawn salary

¶11

This is a digitally signed order.

¶12

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/05/2024 at 12:47:50

¶13

on the said basis, and release the requisite amounts in favour of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks.

¶14

The respondents have filed a compliance affidavit, wherein it is submitted that the directions passed by the Learned Division Bench have been duly complied with. The compliance affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, reads as under:-

¶15

“xxx xxx xxx

¶16

1. It is submitted that in compliance to Hon’ble High Court’s Order dated 01.11.2022, the following payment have been made to the petitioner on 15.11.2022 through NEFT.

¶17

S.No.	Particular	Amount
i.	Arrear of gratuity	Rs. 48048/-
ii.	Arrear of leave salary	Rs. 28878/-
iii.	Arrear of commutation	Rs. 55062/-
iv.	Total	Rs. 131,988/-

¶18

2. It is relevant to mention here that the petitioner had visited the office of the respondent on 15.11.2022 and confirmed above payment and shown its satisfaction.

¶19

3. It is submitted that no duesarepending in favour of petitioner. It is further submitted that the PPO of the petitioner has also been revised. The copy of the revised PPO of the petitioner is annexed herewith as Annuexure-A.

¶20

4. The following payment in favour of the petitioner have been cleared by the Sr. DFM, Delhi Division, Northern Railway on 09/02/2023. The details of the same is given below and also attached as Annuexure-B.

¶21

S. No.	Particular	Amount
i.	AB No-03030722027666	Rs. 304412/-
ii.	AB No-03030722027667	Rs. 5668/-
iii.	AB No-03030722027668	Rs. 7481/-
	Total	Rs. 317561/-

¶22

xxx xxx xxx”

¶23

Considering the aforesaid, it is manifest that the necessary

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/05/2024 at 12:47:50

¶26

compliances have been made by the respondents.

¶27

At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the payments, as mentioned in the compliance affidavit filed by the respondents, have been received, however, there are certain other dues that are payable to the petitioner, for which she submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to agitate his claims.

¶28

However, the aforesaid submission is disputed by learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶29

Considering the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of, as having been satisfied. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to agitate his claims for any further dues, if admissible, in accordance with law.

¶30

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶31

MAY 2, 2024

¶32

¶33

This is a digitally signed order.

¶34

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/05/2024 at 12:47:50

Sahib Singh v. T P Singh & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahib Singh v. T P Singh & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Rishi Vs Gyanesh Bharti & Ors.

All India Spices Importers and Distributors Association Vs Union of India, through Sh. Sanjay Malhotra, Revenue Secretary, Ministry of Finance & Anr.

Munna Lal Ram Dayal Vs Virender Kumar Gupta and Ors.

Anmol Singh @ Anmol Chib Vs Gaurav Chib

Shivali Chandra Vs Ashish Singh

Rannu Devi & Anr. Vs Sandeep Kumar & Ors.

Pankaj Kumar and Ors. Vs S Kishore Chairman

Bhawna and Ors. Vs S. Kishore, Chairman

All India Spices Importers and Distributors Association Vs Union of India, through Sh. Sanjay Malhotra, Revenue Secretary, Ministry of Finance & Anr.

Munna Lal Ram Dayal Vs Virender Kumar Gupta and Ors.

Anmol Singh @ Anmol Chib Vs Gaurav Chib

Kushmakar Rastogi Vs Versha Joshi & Ors.

Smt. Veena Devi Vs Mr. Praveen Kumar

Newtech Promoters and Developers Private Limited Vs Bank of Mharashtra