Petitioner failed to appear before the Court or the earlier IPAB since 2018. The Court found the petitioner no longer interested in pursuing the matter and dismissed the petition in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
RAM JI PRASAD .....Petitioner
Through: None. versus
RAJ KUMAR MAURYA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 14.11.2024
“The service report of the petitioner is once again awaited, like they were for the last few hearings. Despite repeated efforts, the service could not be affected over the petitioner. Moreover, none has appeared for the petitioner ever on its own.
List the matter before the Hon'ble Court for further directions on 25.09.2024. ”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:13:33
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
NOVEMBER 14, 2024 au
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:13:33
RAM JI PRASAD
RAJ KUMAR MAURYA
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
