Disposed

Manash Lifestyle Private Limited v. Ghanshyam Proprietor of Lakshita Trading Co. & Anr.

Delhi HC22 Oct 2024C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)/161/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rectification petition seeking removal of a Class-25 registered trademark from respondent no. 1, who was alleged to be counterfeiting the petitioner's mark 'PURPLLE'. Respondent no. 1 stated he wished to give up the mark and would not use it; the Court cancelled the mark and directed the Trade Marks Registry to remove it.

What did the court decide?

Trademark (application no. 4630264, Class-25) cancelled; Registry directed to remove it from the register.

Manash Lifestyle Private Limited Vs Ghanshyam… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~18

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 161/2024 MANASH LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Nageshwar Kumhar and Mr. Ayush Dey, Advocates Mob: 9818823289 versus GHANSHYAM PROPRIETOR OF LAKSHITA TRADING CO. & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ghanshyam, Respondent no. 1 in person. Mr. Shashank Garg, CGSC with Ms. Avika Jaini, Ms. Nishtha Jain, Ms. Aradhya Chaturvedi and Mr. Raghav Bhatia, Advocates for R-2. Mob: 9910999064 Email: [email protected]

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶6

O R D E R % 22.10.2024

¶7

The present rectification petition has been filed seeking

¶8

rectification/removal of the trademark , bearing application no. 4630264 in Class-25 registered in the name of respondent no. 1.

¶9

This is a digitally signed order.

¶10

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/10/2024 at 14:21:10

¶11

As per the case canvassed by the petitioner, the respondent is counterfeiting the petitioner’s mark ‘PURPLLE’.

¶12

Upon issuance of notice, Mr. Ghanshyam, proprietor of Lakshita Trading Company, has put in appearance. He submits that he wishes to give up the mark in question and he shall not use the same.

¶13

A copy of self attested Aadhar Card as well as the court pass of Mr. Ghanshyam, i.e., respondent no. 1, has been taken on record.

¶14

Accordingly, considering the statement made before this Court, the

¶15

trademark , bearing application no. 4630264 in Class-25, registered in the name of respondent no. 1, is hereby cancelled.

¶16

The Registry of Trade Marks is directed to remove the mark of respondent no. 1 from its register. The rectification in the register of Trade Marks be carried out, accordingly.

¶17

The Registry is directed to supply a copy of the present order to the Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks of India, on E-mail Id: [email protected], for compliance.

¶18

The present petition is accordingly disposed of, with the aforesaid directions.

¶19

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶20

OCTOBER 22, 2024 ak

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/10/2024 at 14:21:10

Manash Lifestyle Private Limited v. Ghanshyam Proprietor of Lakshita Trading Co. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manash Lifestyle Private Limited v. Ghanshyam Proprietor of Lakshita Trading Co. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Subrata Kumar Baksi Vs Mr Mahesh Gupta

New Balance Athletics, Inc. Vs Pulkit Khubchandani

Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited Vs Cg Power and Industrial Solutions Limited & Anr.

Kunj Bihari Food Processors Private Limited Vs Shree Shakambari Rice Mill Private Limited & Ors.

Rathi Foundation Vs Lakshmanveer Steel (P) Ltd. & Others

Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Private Limited Vs Moospring Dairy Farm Private Limited & Anr.