In this appeal before the Delhi High Court, the Court noted the consistent absence of the appellant and their trademark agent. Finding the appeal non-prosecuted, the Court dismissed it for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
SIEMENS ENTERPRISE COMMUNICATIONS GMBH AND CO.KG ..... Appellant
Through: None.
versus
THE CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC along with Mr. Zubin Singh, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 15.04.2024
ANISH DAYAL, J
APRIL 15, 2024/kct/sc
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/04/2024 at 12:19:53
Siemens Enterprise Communications GmbH and Co. Kg
Controller General of Patents and Designs
Anonymous
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
