Patent appeal against refusal decision; appellants repeatedly absent despite service of court notices and notice to registered patent agents. Appeal dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION AND ANR. .....Appellants Through: None.
versus
CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC with Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra, Mr. Alexander Mathai Paikaday, Advocates (M:9810788606)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 11:36:22
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
AUGUST 7, 2024 au
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 11:36:22
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Controller of Patents
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
