Disposed

Emitech Gesellschaft Fur Emissionstechnologie Mbh v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks and Anr.

Delhi HC23 Jan 2024C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT)/299/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal after accepting the respondents' offer to reconsider the application. The impugned order was set aside, the file restored, and a fresh de novo hearing ordered within three months.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order set aside; file restored; de novo hearing ordered; decision to be made within three months.

Emitech Gesellschaft Fur Emissionstechnologie Mbh Vs… — Intellectual Property | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~4

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 299/2022

¶4

EMITECH GESELLSCHAFT FUR EMISSIONSTECHNOLOGIE MBH ..... Appellant

¶5

Through: Mr. Manish Singh, Mr. Abhai Pandey, Mr. Varun Sharma, Mr. Manish Aryan, Mr. Gautam Kumar, Ms. Swati Mittal, Ms. Priyanka Anand, Ms. Shivani Singh and Mr. Dhruv Tandan, Advocates

¶6

versus

¶7

CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS DESIGNS AND TRADEMARKS AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Zubin Singh, Advocate for UOI.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 23.01.2024

¶11

Ms. Nidhi Raman, Central Government Standing Counsel for Union of India, states on instructions that in light of the grievances expressed by Appellant (as noted in the order dated 9^th January, 2024), Respondents are agreeable to reconsider Appellant’s application, without prejudice to their rights and contentions,

¶12

In light of the above, the present appeal is disposed of with the following directions:

¶13

i) The impugned order dated 13^th September, 2019 passed by

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/06/2024 at 12:09:46

¶15

Respondent No. 2 (Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs) is set aside. ii) The file is restored to its original number. The proceedings must be considered de novo after providing a fresh opportunity for hearing to the Appellant.

¶16

iii) Respondents shall decide the appeal within three months from today. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. Respondents shall decide the matter uninfluenced by any observations made in the impugned order.

¶17

With the above directions, the appeal is disposed of.

¶18

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶19

JANUARY 23, 2024 nk

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/06/2024 at 12:09:46

Emitech Gesellschaft Fur Emissionstechnologie Mbh v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Emitech Gesellschaft Fur Emissionstechnologie Mbh v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandoz Private Ltd. Vs Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Anr.

Levi Strauss and Co. Vs Nab Productions Private Limited and Ors. & Ors.

Su Kam Power Systems Limited Vs Sukam Nextgen India Private Limited & Ors.

Yang Liping a Chinese Citizen Vs Controller of Patents and Designs

Su-Kam Power Systems Limited Vs Bindal Powertech Private Limted & Ors.

Amba Motorcyles Thr. Sh. Sanjeev Kapoor Vs Mahavir Prasad