Appeal against the Controller of Patents was dismissed as it was voluntarily withdrawn by the appellant's counsel.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Sanuj Das, Advocate.
versus
THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC with Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra, Mr. Alexander Mathai Paikaday, Mr. Lakshay Gunawat and Mr. Krishnan V., Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 06.05.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
MAY 6, 2024 as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 11:18:27
Ventana Medical Systems, Inc
The Controller of Patents
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
