The appellant voluntarily withdrew the appeal. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, disposing of pending applications as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
ALPHAVAX INC
..... Appellant
Through: Tanveer Malhotra and Debashish Banerjee, Advs. for the Appellant (9833397587)
versus
CONTROLLER OF PATENTS ..... Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R
% 05.02.2024 1. Mr. Tanveer Malhotra, counsel appearing on behalf of appellant, through video conferencing, states on instructions that the appellant does not wish to pursue the present appeal any further and seeks liberty to withdraw the same.
ANISH DAYAL, J
FEBRUARY 5, 2024/sm/ ig
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 02:44:22
ALPHAVAX INC
CONTROLLER OF PATENTS
ANISH DAYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
