Disposed

M/S Pachranga International Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Pachranga International (Chamber Group) and Anr.

Delhi HC22 May 2024C.O.(COMM.IPD-CR)/788/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Multiple civil suits and a commercial petition were settled via an agreement dated May 13, 2024. The High Court, after perusing the terms, disposed of the matters in accordance with the settlement.

What did the court decide?

The suits/C.O. were disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement; a specific assignment deed was declared null and void; a party was deleted from one suit.

M/S Pachranga International Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~14,17,18,19,20 &27.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

C.O.(COMM.IPD-CR) 788/2022

¶4

M/S PACHRANGA INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Kashish Sethi, Mr. A. Singh and Ms. Ritu Khandelwal, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

M/S PACHRANGA INTERNATIONAL (CHAMBER GROUP) AND ANR ..... Respondent

¶8

Through:

¶9

17+ CS(COMM) 181/2018

¶10

AMIT DHINGRA AND SORS ..... Plaintiff

¶11

Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate.

¶12

versus

¶13

VED CHANDANA AND SORS ..... Defendant

¶14

Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Kashish Sethi, Mr. A. Singh and Ms. Ritu Khandelwal, Advocates.

¶15

18+ CS(COMM) 185/2018

¶16

M/S PACHRANGA INTERNATIONAL ..... Plaintiff

¶17

Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate.

¶18

versus

¶19

M/S GAZAB INDIA ..... Defendant

¶20

Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Kashish Sethi,

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 12:33:07

¶23

Mr. A. Singh and Ms. Ritu Khandelwal, Advocates.

¶24

19+ CS(COMM) 186/2018 & I.A. 14052/2013

¶25

PACHRANGA INTERNATIONAL ..... Plaintiff

¶26

Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate.

¶27

versus

¶28

PACHRANGA INTERNATIONAL P.LTD. ..... Defendant

¶29

Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Kashish Sethi, Mr. A. Singh and Ms. Ritu Khandelwal, Advocates.

¶30

20+ CS(COMM) 253/2018

¶31

PACHRANGA INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD...... Plaintiff

¶32

Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Kashish Sethi, Mr. A. Singh and Ms. Ritu Khandelwal, Advocates.

¶33

versus

¶34

M/S PACHRANAGA INTERNATIONAL & ORS...... Defendant

¶35

Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate. 27+ CS(COMM) 196/2022 & I.A. 4806/2006

¶36

SHRI CHANDER MOHAN DHINGRA ..... Plaintiff

¶37

Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate.

¶38

versus

¶39

SHRI RAJINDER KUMAR DHINGRA AND ORS..... Defendant

¶40

Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Kashish Sethi, Mr. A. Singh and Ms. Ritu Khandelwal,

¶41

This is a digitally signed order.

¶42

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 12:33:07

¶43

Advocates.

¶44

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶45

O R D E R % 22.05.2024

¶46

These matters have been settled before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre by settlement agreement dated 13^th May, 2024.

¶47

The terms of settlement agreed between the parties are as under:

¶48

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 12:33:07

¶49

This is a digitally signed order.

¶50

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 12:33:07

¶51

The Court has perused the terms of settlement and find them to be lawful and acceptable.

¶52

The said agreement is executed by authorised signatories of the partis and counter signed by the respective counsel. Counsel for parties are also present in the Court and confirm the same.

¶53

Accordingly, CS(COMM) 181/2018, CS(COMM) 185/2018, CS(COMM) 186/2018 & CS(COMM) 253/2018 are disposed of in term of settlement agreement ( in accordance with para 3 of the settlement agreement as noted above ).

¶54

C.O.(COMM.IPD-CR) 788/2022 is allowed in terms of above settlement ( as per para 7 of the settlement agreement as noted above ).

¶55

This is a digitally signed order.

¶56

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 12:33:07

¶57

CS (COMM) 196/2022 is disposed of in terms of settlement and the assignment deed dated 26^th March, 2002, shall be treated as null, void, and cancelled ( as per para 6 of the settlement terms noted above ).

¶58

As per para 3 of the settlement agreement, Mr. Ved Chandana is to be deleted from the array of parties in CS(COMM) 181/2018.

¶59

It is directed accordingly.

¶60

Present suits/petitions are disposed of in terms of the above settlement.

¶61

Pending applications, if any, are rendered infructuous.

¶62

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶63

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶64

MAY 22, 2024/RK/sc

¶65

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶66

M/S Pachranga International Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Pachranga International (Chamber Group) and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Pachranga International Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Pachranga International (Chamber Group) and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Abrol Vs Yogesh Kumar Rustogi

Honeywell International Inc. Vs the Controller of Patents

Casablanca Apparels Pvt. Ltd. Vs Polo Lauren Company Lp & Anr. & Anr.

M/S Bright Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Narang Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Compton Greaves Consumer Electricals Ltd. Tower 3, 1ST Floor, East Wing, Lbs Marg, Kurla (Est), Mum Vs Ramesh Kumar M/S Aggarwal Iron Store of Chopta Bazaar, Hansi, Hissar, Haryana

Bayerische Motoren Werke Ag Vs Om Balajee Automobile (India) Private Limited