An interpleader or commercial dispute. The petitioner applied to withdraw the petition based on a settlement agreement executed between the parties. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition.
Application to withdraw petition allowed; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
Through: Mr. Himanshu Sehrawat, Advocate.
versus
PABBATHIREDDY RAMAKRISHNA REDDY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC with Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra, Mr. Alexander Mathai Paikaday, Mr. Lakshay Gunawat and Mr. Krishnan V., Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 01.05.2024
I.A. 9623/2024 (on behalf of the Petitioner seeking withdrawal of the petition)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:54:19
C.O.(COMM.IPD-CR) 725/2022
SANJEEV NARULA, J
MAY 1, 2024 nk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:54:19
1 provisions across 1 enactments
INTENSE TECHNOLOGIES LTD
PABBATHIREDDY RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
