Disposed

Greesh Kumar Bansal & Anr. v. Asian Hotels (North) Limited

Delhi HC22 Feb 2024O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)/93/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a petition seeking termination of an arbitrator's mandate by granting liberty to file separate applications under Sections 12 and 13 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The court also extended the arbitrator's mandate for six months with party consent, subject to the arbitrator dealing with any bias applications first.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of arbitrator extended for six months; petition for termination disposed of with liberty to file bias applications.

Greesh Kumar Bansal & Anr. Vs Asian Hotels (North) Limited — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~1 & 12

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 93/2023 GREESH KUMAR BANSAL & ANR. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Agarwal, Sr. Adv., Ms. Niyati Kohli, Mr. Pratham Vir Agarwal and Ms. Tanya, Advs. versus ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Sr. Adv., Ms. Manyaa Chandok, Ms. Harleen Kaur Rait, Ms. Molly Agarwal and Ms. Satakshi Jain, Advs. 12 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 389/2023 ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sidhant Kumar, Ms. Manyaa Chandok, Ms. Harleen Kaur Rait, Ms. Satakshi Jain, Ms. Molly Agarwal, Advs.

¶3

versus GREESH KUMAR BANSAL	& ANR.			.....	Responde	nt
Through:	Mr. San	deep	Ag	arwal,	Sr. Adv.,	Ms.
	Niyati	Koh	li,	Mr.	Pratham	Vir
	Agarwal	and	Ms.	Tany	a, Advs.

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R

¶5

% 22.02.2024

¶6

I.A. 19389/2023-EX.

¶7

Exemption is granted subject to all just exceptions.

¶8

The petitioner shall file legible and clearer copies of exempted

¶9

documents, compliant with practice rules before the next date of hearing.

¶10

The application is disposed of.

¶11

This is a digitally signed order.

¶12

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/03/2024 at 11:29:18

¶13

O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 93/2023

¶14

This is a petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking termination of mandate of the Ld. Arbitrator in respect of the arbitration proceedings between the parties and appointment of a substitute Sole Arbitrator.

¶15

Mr. Agarwal, learned senior counsel on instruction of Ms. Kohli, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise objection regarding the bias of the Sole Arbitrator in accordance with Sections 12 and 13 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

¶16

Since the mandate of the arbitral tribunal had expired, the present petition was filed in this Court.

¶17

Since the mandate of the arbitral tribunal is being extended, Mr. Agarwal, learned senior counsel on instructions states that he will file an application under Sections 12 and 13 within two weeks from today.

¶18

The learned senior counsel states that O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 93/2023 may be treated as the petitioners’ application under Sections 12 and 13 of the Act.

¶19

Granting the aforesaid liberty, the present petition is disposed of.

¶20

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 389/2023

¶21

This is a petition under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of the mandate of the Ld. Sole Arbitrator for a period of three months from 12.08.2023 to 12.11.2023 for passing the arbitral award.

¶22

With consent of parties, the mandate of the arbitral tribunal is extended for a period of six months from today to make and publish the arbitral award.

¶23

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/03/2024 at 11:29:18

¶24

In case the arbitrator allows the application filed by the respondent under Sections 12 and 13 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the parties shall be free to approach this Court for appointment of a Substitute Arbitrator. The rights and contentions of the parties are left open. 13. Before proceedings to pronounce the award, if any, the Sole Arbitrator shall deal with the applications proposed to be filed by the respondent under Sections 12 and 13 of the Act, in accordance with the law. 14. With above observations, the petition is disposed of.

¶25

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶26

FEBRUARY 22, 2024/NG

¶27

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶28

Greesh Kumar Bansal & Anr. v. Asian Hotels (North) Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Greesh Kumar Bansal & Anr. v. Asian Hotels (North) Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Harpreet Singh Vs Smt. Payal Bansal

Psa Protech and Infralogistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs Food Corporation of India

Joginder Singh Nijjar and Anr. Vs M/S Omaxe Ltd.

M/S Tomar and Company Vs Union of India

Ms Khanna Paper Mills Ltd. Vs Ms the New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

M/S Karvy Digikonnekt Ltd. Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited