Arbitration petition withdrawn after parties settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas-II scheme; withdrawal application allowed and petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Leena Tuteja and Ms. Ishita Kadyan, Advocates.
versus M/S MOHAMAD MUZAFAR SHAWL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok K. Shahi, Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Ms. Harshita Gupta, Mr. Akshat Kulshesthra and Mr. Shubham Kumar Mishra, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 06.02.2024
I.A. 2866/2024
By way of the present application filed on the principles of section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure 1908, the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, stating that the parties have arrived at a settlement under the ‘ Vivad Se Vishwas-II ’ scheme.
Ms. Leena Tuteja, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner accordingly wishes to withdraw the present petition.
Accordingly, the application is allowed and disposed-of.
O.M.P. (COMM) 542/2016
In view of the prayer made in the above application, the petition stands disposed-of as withdrawn
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
FEBRUARY 6, 2024/ ak
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:31:35
1 provisions across 1 enactments
IRCON International Ltd
M/S Mohamad Muzafar Shawl
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
