Withdrawal order with no proposition of general application; the petitioner was permitted to withdraw the petition to correct inadvertent errors.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
versus
SURENDER GOEL AND OTHERS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.W. Haider and Ms. Pooja Dua, Advocates.
Mr. Sonal Anand with Mr. Rishikesh Deo, Advocates for R-6.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 12.02.2024
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action, submitting that there are inadvertent errors in the petition which need to be corrected.
The petition is accordingly disposed-of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed-for; without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2024 V.Rawat
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2024 at 14:44:45
Abhishek Dutt
Surender Goel and Others
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
