Allowed an IA seeking leave to withdraw the main petition based on a settlement between the parties under the Vivad Se Vishwas II scheme.
Allowed the IA for leave to withdraw; disposed of the main petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nikhil Mehta and Mr. Raghav Arora, Advocates.
versus
M/S SUNWAY CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Amit George and Mr. Adhishwar Suri, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R
% 19.01.2024
I.A. No. 1418/2024
By way of the present application filed on the principles of section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure 1908, the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, stating that the parties have settled their disputes under the ‘ Vivad Se Vishwas II’ scheme.
O.M.P. (COMM) 483/2016
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
JANUARY 19, 2024/ VR
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:11:54
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s National Highways Authority of India
M/s Sunway Construction Sdn Bhd
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
