Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking interim orders was treated as an application under Section 17 after an arbitrator's appointment, with the interim order continuing until adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
MR. INDERPREET SINGH BHATIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr Rohit Gandhi, Ms Charu Sahai and Ms Akshita Nigam, Advs.
versus
SATISH TANDON & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr Sudhindra Tripathi and Mr Yashwant Singh Baghel, Advs. for R-1. Mr Rohit Oberoi, Adv. for R-2 & R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
JASMEET SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 4, 2024/ sr Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2024 at 11:00:19
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Inderpreet Singh Bhatia
Satish Tandon
Respondents 2 & 3
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
