Post-award Section 9 petition by award holder, who had since initiated enforcement proceedings. Counsel did not press the petition with liberty to raise contentions in enforcement. Petition and application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
M/S RAMESTH CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Avinash Trivedi, Advocate.
versus
M/S NIRALA HOUSING PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rattan Kr. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sewtank S., Mr. Sanjeev Arora, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 10.04.2024
This is a post award petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the award holder. The award holder has since filed proceedings for enforcement of the award.
Mr. Avinash Trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, does not press this petition with liberty to agitate all contentions available to the award holder in the enforcement proceedings.
The petition, alongwith pending application, is disposed of with these observations.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
APRIL 10, 2024 ‘Bhupi’/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 11:56:45
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Ramesth Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
M/S Nirala Housing Pvt. Ltd.
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
