The High Court of Delhi disposed of an application filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act as withdrawn upon the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
Petition and pending application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
versus
M/S BHASIN INFOTECH & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil K. Airi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ravinder Singh, Ms. Sadhana Sharma, Ms. Raveesha Gupta, Mr Mudit Rohella, Advs.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R D E R % 09.05.2024
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that they do not want to press the petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the submissions made, the present petition along with pending application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
MAY 9, 2024/AR..
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 11:51:01
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAJEEV JAIN & SONS (HUF)
M/S BHASIN INFOTECH & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
