A Section 9 interim-relief petition in an arbitration dispute was withdrawn in favour of raising all prayers for interim relief before the learned Arbitrator under Section 17; the court granted that liberty and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
Through: Mr. Sahil Chopra, Mr. Nitin Gupta, Ms. Aadrisha Malhotra, Mr. Ayush Chauhan, Mr. Keshav Ray, Ms. Anjali Sesodia, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 16.01.2024
JASMEET SINGH, J
JANUARY 16, 2024/NG
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2024 at 15:16:23
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner could seek interim relief before the arbitrator under Section 17 instead of pursuing this Section 9 petition.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr Gireesh M Dhande Sole Proprietor of M/s Jaipraj Engneering Company
M/s Sarens Heavy Lift India Pvt Ltd
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
