Allowed

Smartworks Coworking Spaces Private Limited v. Tutelage Profeesionals Private Limited

Delhi HC20 Sept 2024O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/185/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, granting permission to remove fixtures. The court appointed an arbitrator, designated DIAC as the institution, and directed parties to approach the arbitrator within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; Sole Arbitrator appointed; Permission granted for removal of fixtures from 23.09.2024 to 28.09.2024; Arbitration under DIAC.

Smartworks Coworking Spaces Private Limited Vs Tutelage… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~46

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 185/2024

¶4

SMARTWORKS COWORKING SPACES PRIVATE LIMITED

¶5

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Mathur, Mr. Ankit Kohli, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

TUTELAGE PROFEESIONALS PRIVATE LIMITED

¶8

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Ratti, Ms. Mallika Kamal, Advs. Mr. Kapoor, Adv.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

% 20.09.2024

¶13

This is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking petitioner to remove goods, fixtures, fittings lying in Office Space No.2, 6^th Floor, admeasuring 17,800 sq. ft. in Commercial Plot No. 10, Community Centre, Block-B, Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi.

¶14

It is an admitted case that the petitioner had signed a Letter of Intent (“LoI”) dated 06.05.2022 to take on lease the said office space.

¶15

Subsequently, the respondent purchased the property and the petitioner entered into a lease deed dated 12.06.2023 with the respondent for the said premises.

¶16

Pursuant to the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) proceedings against the respondent, the petitioner has vacated the leased premises.

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:10:45

¶18

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that as of today, only permission may be granted to remove its fixtures and fittings as per the photographs annexed at page Nos. 83 to 91 and list annexed at page Nos. 92 to 97 of the paper book.

¶19

Mr. Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, states that the respondent has no objection if the petitioner removes its fixtures and fittings installed in the demised premises in a civilized manner and without causing damage to the building premises.

¶20

For the said reasons, the petitioner is permitted to remove its fixtures and fittings as shown at pages 83 to 91 and mentioned in list annexed at page Nos. 92 to 97 of the paper book from 23.09.2024 to 28.09.2024, during working hours. The petitioner will ensure that no damage is caused to the leased premises.

¶21

The lease deed dated 12.06.2023 between the petitioner and the respondent contains an arbitration clause being clause XXVI which reads as under:-

¶22

“XXVI. SETTLEMENT AND ARBITRATION:

¶23

1. The parties hereto have agreed to amicably settle and/or resolve all disputes and differences arising out of these presents or otherwise concerning the Lease/Occupation/Use of the Premises amongst themselves; but in the event any dispute of whatsoever nature is incapable of being resolved amongst the parties hereto amicably then and in that event the parties have agreed to refer all disputes and differences including the construction scope or effect of any of the terms and conditions herein contained or otherwise concerning the

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:10:45

¶26

Lease/Occupation/Use of the Premises and/or the determination of any right and/or liability and/or in any way touching or concerning these presents or otherwise concerning the Lease/Occupation/Use of the Premises to the sole Arbitration of an independent arbitrator to be appointed mutually by the Parties.

¶27

2. The Arbitration proceedings shall be under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or any statutory modification or enactment thereto for the time being in force.

¶28

3. The Arbitrator shall have summary powers.

¶29

4. The Arbitrator shall be entitled to lay down his own procedure.

¶30

5. It will not be obligatory on the part of the Arbitrator to follow the principles of the Indian Evidence Act or the procedures laid down under the Civil Procedure Code unless enjoined on him by any statute of law for the time being in force.

¶31

6. The Arbitrator shall be entitled to give interim awards and directions, which shall be binding on the parties.”

¶32

The parties jointly state that an Arbitrator be appointed to adjudicate claims/ counter-claims between the parties.

¶33

For the said reasons, the petition is allowed and the following directions are issued:-

¶34

i) Mr. Virender Mehta, Advocate (Mob. No. 9811151865) is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes

¶35

This is a digitally signed order.

¶36

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:10:45

¶37

between the parties.

¶38

ii) The arbitration will be held under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the „DIAC‟).

¶39

iii) The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of DIAC (Administrative Cost and Arbitrators‟ Fees) Rules, 2018.

¶40

iv) The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Act prior to entering into the reference.

¶41

v) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including as to the arbitrability of any of the claim, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims/counter-claims and merits of the dispute of either of the parties, is left open for adjudication by the learned arbitrator.

¶42

vi) The parties shall approach the learned Arbitrator within two weeks from today.

¶43

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶44

SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 / (MS)

¶45

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶46

This is a digitally signed order.

¶47

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:10:45

Smartworks Coworking Spaces Private Limited v. Tutelage Profeesionals Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smartworks Coworking Spaces Private Limited v. Tutelage Profeesionals Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs Bird Airport Hotel Pvt. Ltd.

Eastern Software Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University

Ge Power India Limited Vs Shiga Energy Private Ltd.

Hoya Medical Pvt. Ltd. Vs Everest Vision

Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Technical Research Organization and Anr.

Snap on Tools Private Limited Vs Ms R K Pneumatic and Equipment