Disposed

Velocity Landmark Developers LLP v. Ms Sabs and Associates

Delhi HC14 May 2024O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/149/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Parties consented to arbitration but disagreed on the arbitrator. The court appointed Justice M.L. Mehta (retd.) as sole arbitrator, permitted the petitioner's interim-relief petition to be treated as a section 17 application before him, fixed fees per the Fourth Schedule shared equally, kept all claims open, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Justice M.L. Mehta (retd.) appointed sole arbitrator; section 9 petition convertible to section 17 application; claims/counter-claims kept open.

Velocity Landmark Developers LLP Vs Ms Sabs and Associates — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~33

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 149/2024

¶4

VELOCITY LANDMARK DEVELOPERS LLP ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Harkirat Sawhney and Mr. Rati Coshic, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

MS SABS AND ASSOCIATES ..... Respondent

¶8

Through: Mr. Vivek Kohli, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Neetika Bajaj, Advocate.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 14.05.2024

¶11

At the outset, Mr. Vivek Kohli, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent on advance copy, submits that the respondent has already invoked arbitration; and that in response to that invocation, the petitioner has not opposed reference of disputes to arbitration, except that they have not agreed to the name of the arbitrator proposed by the respondent.

¶12

Mr. Harikirat Sawhney, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner agrees with the submission made; and states that the disputes between the parties be referred to arbitration.

¶13

Furthermore, as suggested by Mr. Kohli, Mr. Sawhney is also agreeable to the present petition under section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (‘A&C Act’) being referred to the arbitrator straightway as an application under section 17 of the A&C Act.

¶14

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 149/2024 Page 1 of 3

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:40:24

¶17

Learned counsel for the parties have suggested the name of Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.L. Mehta, former Judge of this court for appointment as the learned Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of their disputes.

¶18

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed-of appointing Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.L. Mehta, former Judge of this Court (Cellphone No.: +91 9910384620) as the learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties.

¶19

The learned Sole Arbitrator would furnish to the parties requisite disclosures as required under section 12 of the A&C Act; and in the event there is any impediment to the appointment on that count, the parties are given liberty to file an appropriate application in this court.

¶20

The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fee in accordance with Fourth Schedule to the A&C Act; or as may otherwise be agreed to between the parties and the learned Arbitrator.

¶21

Parties shall share the arbitrator’s fee and arbitral costs, equally.

¶22

All rights and contentions of the parties in relation to the claims/counter-claims are kept open, to be decided by the learned Arbitrator on their merits, in accordance with law.

¶23

Parties are directed to approach the learned Arbitrator appointed within 01 week.

¶24

Furthermore, the petitioner is permitted to place the present petition as an application under section 17 of the A&C Act before the learned Arbitrator within 02 weeks; which the learned Arbitrator may decide in accordance with law.

¶25

A copy of this order be communicated by the Registry via e-mail to the learned Sole Arbitrator, as also to learned counsel for the parties.

¶26

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 149/2024 Page 2 of 3

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:40:24

¶29

The petition stands disposed-of in the above terms.

¶30

Other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.

¶31

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J

¶32

MAY 14, 2024/ V.Rawat

¶33

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 149/2024 Page 3 of 3

¶34

This is a digitally signed order.

¶35

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:40:24

Velocity Landmark Developers LLP v. Ms Sabs and Associates

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Velocity Landmark Developers LLP v. Ms Sabs and Associates

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesth Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs Eldeco Infrastructure and Properties Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Akash Electro Tek Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Northern Railway

Dsc Limited Vs Union of India & Anr.

Ovington Finance Private Limited Vs T.D. Engineering Works & Ors.

Cofco International India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Swastik Agro Impex India Pvt. Ltd.

Surender Pratap Singh Chauhan Vs Smt. Dharamvati & Ors.