Dismissed

Adedge India Water Technologies Private Limited v. Jakson Limited

Delhi HC8 May 2024O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/134/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of an interim petition for protection and stay of bank guarantees. With the parties' consent, the court referred the contractual disputes to arbitration before a nominee arbitrator and treated the petition as an application under Section 17 of the Act.

What did the court decide?

Disputed matters referred to the arbitrator Mr. Justice Vipin Sanghi; the petition treated under Section 17 of the Act.

Adedge India Water Technologies Private Limited Vs Jakson… — Specific Performance | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~22

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 134/2024

¶4

ADEDGE INDIA WATER TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Ms. Wamika Trehan, Mr. Varun Chopra and Mr. Siddhant Kumar, Advocates. versus

¶5

JAKSON LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manik Dogra and Mr Dhruv Pande, Advocates.

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶7

O R D E R % 08.05.2024

¶8

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“the Act”], for interim measures of protection in anticipation of arbitral proceedings under two work orders dated 30.09.2023 and 27.10.2023, issued by respondent No.1 to it. Both work orders contain arbitration clauses which provide for arbitration by a nominee of the respondent. Delhi has been designated as the venue of arbitration and exclusive jurisdiction has also been vested in the Courts in Delhi.

¶9

As noted in the order dated 02.05.2024, the first prayer in the petition, for a stay of invocation of certain bank guarantees, has been

¶10

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 134/2024

¶11

Page 1 of 3

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/05/2024 at 11:46:55

¶14

rendered infructuous as the bank guarantees have already been enchased. 3. With regard to the remaining prayers, it is agreed by Mr. Arvind Nayar, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Manik Dogra, learned counsel for respondent No.1, that the matter may be referred to arbitration in these proceedings and the petition may be treated as an application under Section 17 of the Act before the arbitrator.

¶15

Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the petition is disposed of, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, with the following directions:

¶16

a. The disputes between the petitioner and respondent No. 1, under the work orders dated 30.09.2023 and 27.10.2023, are referred to arbitration of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vipin Sanghi, former Chief Justice, High Court of Uttarakhand [Tel: 9871300037].

¶17

b. The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator will be computed in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Act.

¶18

c. The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration under Section 12 of the Act, prior to entering upon the reference.

¶19

d. The present petition will be treated as an application under Section 17 of the Act, before the learned Arbitrator. The respondent may file its reply thereto, within one week from today, or immediately after the learned Arbitrator enters into the reference, whichever is later.

¶20

e. The parties may request the learned Arbitrator for an expeditious hearing of the application under Section 17 of the Act, at least for the purposes of ad interim orders.

¶21

It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the

¶22

Page 2 of 3

¶23

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 134/2024

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/05/2024 at 11:46:55

¶26

controversy, even on a prima facie basis. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open for adjudication by the learned Arbitrator, and no ad interim orders have been passed by this Court.

PRATEEK JALAN, J

MAY 8, 2024 SS/

Page 3 of 3

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 134/2024

¶31

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/05/2024 at 11:46:55

Adedge India Water Technologies Private Limited v. Jakson Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Adedge India Water Technologies Private Limited v. Jakson Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Radico Khaitan Limited Vs Hasco Systems Private Limited

M/S Indostar Captial Finance Limited Vs G.S. Atwal and Co. & Anr.

M/S Indostar Captial Finance Limited Vs G.S. Atwal and Co. & Anr.

M/S Conarch Associates through Its Partner Vs Ircon International Ltd.

Sachin Atreja and Anr. Vs Surinder Kumar Chhabra and Ors.

Satish Sanpal Vs Abp Network Pvt. Ltd.