Petitioner sought withdrawal of its Section 9 arbitration petition, stating the claim had been satisfied. Respondents raised no objection. The application was allowed and the petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr Venkatesh Kaushik, Adv. (through VC)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
I.A. 39055/2024
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 131/2024
JASMEET SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 10, 2024/ sr Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:18:57
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Propel Shipping Pte Ltd
Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
