Growth Techno Projects Ltd. v. Ishwar Industries Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought leave to withdraw a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, noting that an enforcement petition regarding the same dispute had already been filed. The Court permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Petition withdrawn.
What the court decided
$~12
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- O.M.P. (COMM) 107/2017
GROWTH TECHNO PROJECTS LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sameer Vashisht and Mr. Vanshay Kaul, Advocates.
versus
ISHWAR INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ekta Mehta and Ms. Zainab Khan, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
O R D E R % 02.02.2024
Mr. Sameer Vashisht, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition under section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996, since he submits that an enforcement petition bearing OMP (ENF) (COMM.) No. 224/2023 titled Growth Techno Projects Limited vs. Ishwar Industries Limited has already been filed.
The petition is accordingly disposed-of as withdrawn.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 may be withdrawn in light of a separate enforcement petition already filed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
GROWTH TECHNO PROJECTS LTD.
- respondent
ISHWAR INDUSTRIES LTD.
Coram
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court