Re-Cyber Space Ltd. Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court disposed of an application seeking correction of typographical errors regarding the company name and identification of an ex-promoter in a liquidation order. It directed that the company be read as Cyberspace Ltd. and clarified the payment status of the applicant.
What did the court decide?
Directed that Paragraph-1 and Paragraph-2 of the Order dated 03.12.2024 be corrected to reflect the company name as Cyberspace Ltd. and the payment status of the applicant.
What the court decided
$~C-7
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CO.PET. 354/2001
RE-CYBER SPACE LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate
Versus
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Harshal Kumar & Mr. Suhas Puthige, Advocates for applicants in CO.APPL.1084/2024
Ms. Anjana Gosain, Ms. Nippun Sharma & Mr. Devesh Khanagwal, Advocates for Registrar of companies
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 19.12.2024
CO.APPL.1084/2024
- The present Application under Rule 6 & 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 read with Section 151 CPC has been filed by the Applicant- Sh. Anand Krishna Johri , Ex-Promoter/ Director of the M/S Cyberspace Ltd. for correction of the typographical error in the Order dated 03.12.2024.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application under Rule 6 and 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 read with Section 151 CPC is maintainable for correction of typographical errors in an order.
Whether the name of the company and the identification of the ex-promoter/director need modification in the order to reflect correct details.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Cyber Space Ltd.
- applicant
Anand Krishna Johri
- respondent
Registrar of companies
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court