Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited Vs Tulip Telecom Ltd. through the Official Liquidator

We find that the appeal is directed against the order of 30 September 2024 in terms of which the learned Single Judge while according time to the respondent to file a reply, has posted the matter for 28 January 2025.

¶17

In case the appellant expresses urgency, it is always open for it

¶18

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:51:42

¶19

to move an application for early hearing.

¶20

We thus find no justification to entertain this appeal which shall consequently stand disposed of with liberty reserved to the appellant to move for early hearing.

¶21

YASHWANT VARMA, J.

¶22

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

¶23

DECEMBER 06, 2024 Ch

¶24

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:51:42

Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited v. Tulip Telecom Ltd. through the Official Liquidator

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited v. Tulip Telecom Ltd. through the Official Liquidator

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Commissioner of Central Tax, GST Delhi East Vs a S P Metal Industries

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi Vs India International Centre

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi Vs M/S Indian Olympic Association

Davinder Bajaj Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 23(3), Delhi & Ors.

Sushil Kumar Pandey, Proprietor of M/S. Balaji Enterprises Vs Superintendent, WARD-72, Cgst Delhi and Anr.

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 15 Vs Shri Harish Bhasin