Petition under Article 227 challenging a trial court order; after the respondent produced sales figures, the petitioner did not press the petition, which was disposed of with the interim stay vacated and rights left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
SURYA FOOD AND AGRO LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. N. Mahabir with Mr. P.C. Arya, Advocates. (M): 9818119491
versus
KROWN BAKERS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kapil Kher with Mr. Ankur Gosain, Advocates. (M): 9891072729 Email: [email protected]
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 12.12.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 12:32:56
pending application, stands disposed of.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
DECEMBER 12, 2024
c
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 12:32:56
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Surya Food and Agro Limited
Krown Bakers India Private Limited
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
