Pitam Goel v. Radhey Shyam
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner, defendant no. 1, sought to reopen defence evidence closed by the Trial Court. The petition allowed for withdrawal with liberty to move afresh. Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw with liberty to move afresh granted. Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
What the court decided
$~61
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CM(M) 95/2024
- PITAM GOEL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.S.N. Parashar and Mr.Gaurav Advs.
versus
RADHEY SHYAM ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Mukesh Kr. Sharma, Mr.Arun Kumar Shukla and Mr.Manish Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
- % 16.01.2024
CM APPL. 2792/2024 (exemption)
- Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, defendant no. 1, is granted permission to withdraw a petition seeking to reopen the conclusion of defence evidence pending before the trial court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PITAM GOEL
- respondent
RADHEY SHYAM
Coram
SHALINDER KAUR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court