Dismissed
Asit v. Kalicharan Verma & Anr.
Delhi HCCM(M)/575/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Hon'ble Court disposed of two contempt petitions filed by ASIT as not pressed. Counsel sought withdrawal and requested expedited disposal by the Trial Court.
What did the court decide?
Pending contempt petitions disposed of as not pressed; Trial Court directed to decide cases expeditiously.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~16 & 17
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CM(M) 575/2022 & CM APPL. 27506/2022 ASIT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prag Chawla, Advocate. versus
¶4
- KALICHARAN VERMA & ANR. .....Respondents
¶5
- Through: None.
¶6
- CM(M) 576/2022 & CM APPL. 27510/2022 ASIT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prag Chawla, Advocate. versus
¶7
- OMWATI DEVI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
¶9
O R D E R % 02.08.2024
¶10
- None appears from the side of the respondents.
¶11
- After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. He, however, states that since the case has already reached the stage of final arguments, a request be made to the learned Trial Court to expedite the disposal of the case.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
ASIT
- respondent
Kalicharan Verma & Anr.
- petitioner
ASIT
- respondent
Omwati Devi & Anr.
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court