Petitioner failed to appear despite notice. Respondent's counsel argued petition became infructuous as Trial Court decree favored plaintiff. Court dismissed petition for default and non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
SUNIL KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
VATSAL MITTAL ..... Respondent
Through: Vinay Kumar, Adv. (through VC)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
SHALINDER KAUR, J.
JANUARY 29, 2024 /SDS
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2024 at 12:41:43
Sunil Kumar Gupta
Vatsal Mittal
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
