Single judge order dismissing a petition for expediting trial waitlisted pending order status and directed cooperation. The court disposed the matter without issuing time bound directions due to lack of trial court board status.
Disposed the petition for expedited trial; directed parties to cooperate; no time bound directions issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~79
PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinay Kant Singh, Adv.
versus
PRASHANT BANSAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R % 12.11.2024
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
NOVEMBER 12, 2024 /akc
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/11/2024 at 11:46:21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court can expediting the trial without knowing the status of the trial court board?
Pawan Kumar Sharma
Prashant Bansal
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
