Allowed

Jagdish Sharma v. Navtej Singh and Ors.

Delhi HC8 Jan 2024CM(M)/35/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this brief order, the Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition under Article 227 seeking release of funds from an FDR. The Court allowed the application, directing the release of Rs. 10 lakhs for the petitioner's urgent financial needs due to disability and age.

What did the court decide?

Allowed release of Rs. 10 lakhs with interest; remaining balance to stay in FDR for 36 months.

Jagdish Sharma Vs Navtej Singh and Ors. — Delhi HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~18

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CM(M) 35/2024

¶4

JAGDISH SHARMA ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Mr. Dheeraj & Mr. Sanjay Shisodia, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

NAVTEJ SINGH AND ORS ..... Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr. Yuvraj Sharma, Adv. Proxy for Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-3.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

% 08.01.2024

¶13

CM APPL. 992/2024 – EXMP.

¶14

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶15

The application shall stand disposed of.

¶16

CM(M) 35/2024

¶17

This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Learned counsel for the respondent is present on advance notice. They have no objection if the application is allowed as per law.

¶18

Heard. The petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 20.09.2023 passed by the learned PO MACT, Central District Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, whereby, the application moved on behalf of the petitioner/ applicant for pre-mature release of the FDR was dismissed.

¶19

Perusal of the record shows that vide award dated 25.02.2023,

¶20

the petitioner has been awarded a total compensation of

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 14:24:21

¶23

Rs.16,86,358/- along with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization on account of permanent disability to the extent of 90% suffered by the petitioner resulting in amputation the of right lower limb.

¶24

Perusal of the record also shows that Rs.7,12,877/- was ordered to be released in favour of the petitioner and rest of the amount viz. Rs.19,60,000/- was ordered to be kept in FDR for a period of 98 months.

¶25

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is about 70 years of age and he wishes to buy a house, and therefore, urgently requires a sum of Rs. 12 lakhs

¶26

In view of the fact that petitioner is a senior citizen and he has suffered 90% permanent disability, and he appears to be having urgent financial need, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that a sum of Rs.10 lakhs along with interest uptill date kept in the FDR be allowed to be released in favour of the petitioner and the remaining balance amount with interest be kept in FDR for a period of 36 months, if not, already matured.

¶27

A copy of this order be sent to the learned PO MACT for information and necessary compliance.

¶28

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

¶29

JANUARY 8, 2024/ss/

¶30

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 14:24:21

Jagdish Sharma v. Navtej Singh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish Sharma v. Navtej Singh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Verma Vs Sardar Manmohan Singh

Rohan Nigam Vs Megha Nigam

Pioneer Fabricators Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ircon Internation Limited

Sanjeev Lakra Vs Bhim Singh

Mahesh Sharma Vs M/S Capri Global Capital Limited and Ors.

Mohd Iqbal Rajput Vs Kahkashan Khan and Ors.

Namita Gupta Vs Suraj Holdings Limited

A. B. Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Grippers India

Omkar & Anr. Vs Union of India

Rajendri Devi & Ors. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Sridev Sharma Vs Anupam Mathur

Golden Assets Holdings Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs Sanjay Gupta & Anr.

Bhupinder Singh Gulia Vs Sunita & Ors.

Afzal Khan Vs Golf Technologies Pvt. Ltd.