Dismissed
Jagroshni Devi v. Krishan Kumar
Delhi HCCM(M)/300/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of infructuous petition; court recorded statement and dismissed petition as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~59
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CM(M) 300/2021,
¶4
JAGROSHNI DEVI .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Paran Kumar, Advocate. versus
¶6
KRISHAN KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr.Pranay Kumar, Advocate
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
¶8
O R D E R % 20.11.2024
¶9
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous and seeks to withdraw the same.
¶10
The statement of learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
¶11
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
¶12
NOVEMBER 20, 2024/ sky
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
JAGROSHNI DEVI
- respondent
KRISHAN KUMAR
Coram
AI extract
Ravinder Dudeja
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court