Allowed

Smt Sharmila Singh v. Master Abhimanyu Singh & Anr.

Delhi HC5 Jul 2024CM(M)/2376/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a special leave to frame a suit under Article 227, the High Court allowed the petition seeking an early hearing. The court set aside the trial court’s order striking off the petitioner’s defence due to delayed filing, instead imposing a cost of Rs. 10,000 and permitting participation in proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order striking off defence set aside; petitioner permitted to participate; cost of Rs. 10,000 imposed for delay.

Smt Sharmila Singh Vs Master Abhimanyu Singh & Anr. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~54

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of decision^: 05^th July, 2024

¶4

- CM(M) 2376/2024

¶5

SMT SHARMILA SINGH .....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. V S Dubey with Mr. Mandeep Kumar, Advocates.

¶7

versus

¶8

MASTER ABHIMANYU SINGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nitin Arora, Advocate.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶10

J U D G M E N T (oral)

¶11

CM(M) 2376/2024 & CM APPL. 37044/2024 (early hearing)

¶12

The present petition i.e. CM (M) 2376/2024 has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. It impugns order dated 01.03.2024, whereby, the defence of petitioner has been struck off.

¶13

This petition was earlier taken up on 15.05.2024 and the petitioner was directed to effect service upon the respondents through all permissible modes, returnable 08.11.2024.

¶14

In the meanwhile, the instant application seeking early hearing has been moved by the petitioner.

¶15

With the consent of both the parties, the main matter, as such, is also

¶16

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:0 6.07.2024 15:22:33

¶17

CM(M) 2376/2024 1

¶18

taken up today for arguments. Therefore, the application seeking early hearing stands disposed of as allowed.

¶19

The attention of the Court has been drawn towards the impugned order dated 01.03.2024 wherein it is observed that the petitioner herein was required to file amended written statement within 15 days of 04.01.2024, but she filed the written statement beyond the stipulated period. Learned Trial Court also noted that she had also not filed the Affidavit of Income and Assets , despite granting two weeks. Holding that the intention of the petitioner was merely to delay the proceedings and that she was not repeatedly complying with the direction of the Court, her defence was directed to be struck off.

¶20

The matter is now reportedly listed on 20.07.2024 for order on interim maintenance.

¶21

Learned counsel for the respondent (Master Abhimanyu) does not dispute that written statement was filed, albeit , belatedly. However, at the same time, he submits that he has not even received copy of written statement so far. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has assured that the copy of written statement would be supplied to the learned counsel for respondent today itself. It is also assured that the Affidavit of Income and Assets of the petitioner would also be filed before learned Trial Court within one week from today along with all the requisite documents.

¶22

Keeping in mind the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order is found to be harsh. Instead of striking off the defence, the learned Trial Court could have compensated the plaintiff by directing imposing of some reasonable cost.

¶23

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:0 6.07.2024 15:22:33

¶24

CM(M) 2376/2024 2

¶25

The petition is hereby allowed and impugned order striking off defence of petitioner is set aside.

¶26

Resultantly, the petitioner is permitted to participate in the proceedings before the learned Trial Court.

¶27

As undertaken, the aforesaid Affidavit along with the requisite documents be filed within one week from today with advance copy to the opposite side.

¶28

However, for causing delay in the proceedings, the petitioner herein is burdened with cost of Rs. 10,000/- which would be paid to the opposite side before the learned Trial Court on the next date.

¶29

It is expected that learned Trial Court, in view of the aforesaid development, would hear the petitioner herein also on the question of grant of interim maintenance, before passing any order.

¶30

The next date of 08.11.2024 is cancelled.

¶31

Order dasti under the signatures of Court Master.

¶32

(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE

¶33

JULY 5, 2024/ sw

¶34

Signature Not Verified

¶35

CM(M) 2376/2024 3

¶36

Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:0 6.07.2024 15:22:33

Smt Sharmila Singh v. Master Abhimanyu Singh & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Sharmila Singh v. Master Abhimanyu Singh & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ghaziabad Development Authority Vs Durga Prasad

Debarati Bhunia Chakraborty Vs Suman Sankar Bhunia

Pancham Lal Vs Rakesh Kumar

Smt Nirmal Bindal Vs Sh Sanjeev Agarwal

Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr. Vs Sh. Parmod Kumar

Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr. Vs Sh. Bijender

Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr. Vs Sh. Vijay

Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr. Vs Sh. Ashok

Smt Nirmal Bindal Vs Sh Sanjeev Agarwal

Pinky Kaur & Ors. Vs Mohit Shukla

Sapan Ahlawat & Anr. Vs Mohan Clothing Compnay Pvt. Ltd.

Union of India Vs M/S Jay Shree Metals and Engg. Co.

Casa 2 Stays Pvt. Ltd. Vs Vlcc Personal Care Ltd.

Sunita Vs Lalit Sansanwal