Petitioner withdrew the petition as infructuous after partial arguments; court permitted withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh application with schedule before the Family Court, and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
RITURAJ SHUKLA ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar and Mr.Deepak Yadav, Advs.
versus
LYDIA MONICA JOHN ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Jawahar Raja, Mr.Mihir Samson, Mr. Asawari Sodhi and Ms. Aditi Saraswat, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R % 12.01.2024
SHALINDER KAUR, J.
JANUARY 12, 2024 /ss
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2024 at 15:08:23
Rituraj Shukla
Lydia Monica John
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
