Petitioner sought review of dismissal of application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Court held that since the underlying suit was withdrawn due to settlement and thus disposed of, the present petition became infructuous.
Petition disposed of as having become infructuous due to settlement and withdrawal of the underlying suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
.....Petitioner
versus
M/S BALAJI INDUSTRIES
.....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
MANOJ JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 18, 2024/ss
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:16:16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition under Order VII Rule 11 CPC should be disposed of in view of the amicable settlement and withdrawal of the underlying suit.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Ganesh Industries
M/S Balaji Industries
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
