Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a petition after the dispute with the respondent was settled and a consent decree was recorded in the court below.
Permission to withdraw granted; petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
DEVENDER VERMA ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Aditi Gupta (DHCLSC) with petitioner in person.
versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapur with Mr. Akshit Kapur and Mr. Aditya Saxena, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R
% 24.01.2024
SHALINDER KAUR, J.
JANUARY 24, 2024/ SDS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/06/2024 at 13:55:45
DEVENDER VERMA
STATE BANK OF INDIA
SHALINDER KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
