The petitioner sought to withdraw a petition after receiving the principal amount from the respondent. The court recorded the counsel's statement and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
SOM DUTT DUEVEDI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, ASC along with Mr. Arman Monga, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R % 16.12.2024
CM(M) 1781/2023 & CM APPL. 56440/2023 (Stay)
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
DECEMBER 16, 2024
RM
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 11:35:41
Som Dutt Duevedi
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
