A petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner, though represented by counsel, had no instructions and failed to appear despite repeated notices, despite a reported settlement.
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17&18
versus MAHESH SANSANWAL & ORS .....Respondents Through: Respondent No.1 in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
in Court and states that despite her best efforts she has not been able to reach out to the petitioner.
CM(M) 1588/2018 & CM(M) 1152/2019 1
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:03:52
MANOJ JAIN, J
JULY 23, 2024/ sw
CM(M) 1588/2018 & CM(M) 1152/2019 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:03:52
Jyoti Kapur
Mahesh Sansanwal
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
