Petitioner challenged dismissal of application for appointment of Local Commissioner. Court disposed of petition as infructuous because Executing Court appointed Commissioner suo moto, expressly reserving merits.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; proceedings on merits reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
SH. BAHADUR SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mr. Sandeep Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Kr., Adv.
versus
SH. SAT PRAKASH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Sr Adv with Mr. V. P. Rana, Adv
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R % 16.12.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 11:35:36
respondents in CM (M) No. 1701/2023.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
DECEMBER 16, 2024 sk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 11:35:36
Sh. Bahadur Singh
Sh. Sat Prakash & Anr.
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
