Allowed

Bindeshwari Poddar v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC23 Jul 2024BAIL APPLN./870/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an FIR involving cheque dishonour allegations. The Court fixed a contingent bond subject to demonstrating bona fides and cooperating fully with the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety, subject to conditions regarding cooperation with investigation and non-influence of witnesses.

Bindeshwari Poddar Vs State of NCT of Delhi — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 870/2024 BINDESHWARI PODDAR .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Harish Kumar, Adv. with petitioner in person.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Daniya, APP for the State with Mr. Ramesh Kr. Mehta. Mr. Akshay Mehta, Ms. Aastha Jain, Mr. Ankush Mehta, Ms. Abhilasha Niroola& Ms. Manisha Mehta, Advocates SI Bharat Singh, PS Uttam Nagar

¶7

Mr. Rishi Manchanda and Mr. Gurender Rana, Advs. For complainant with complainant in person.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

O R D E R

23.07.2024

This petition is filed seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 55/2023 under Sections 420/406/468/467/471 IPC registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar.

¶13

The Court on 16^th May 2024, on basis of the submissions made by counsel for petitioner and complainant, had referred the parties to mediation in order that they settle their inter se issues.

¶14

The allegation is that an amount of Rs.65,000/- had been paid as

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:51:45

¶17

earnest money by complainant to the petitioner’s daughter on promise of transfer of a property transacted for Rs.6.5 lakhs.

¶18

Investigation is still underway; photocopies of documents have been provided to the IO; other documents are still to be recovered for which the IO has issued summons.

¶19

Counsel for petitioner states that they will cooperate in the investigation and to express their bona fides , state that they are willing to deposit Rs.30,000/- with the Registrar General of this Court within a period of next 2 weeks. The said amount shall be kept in form of an interest-bearing FDR.

¶20

As regards the balance amount, counsel for the petitioner states that they will deposit the same with the Registrar General of this Court, within next 4 months. The said balance amount shall also be also kept in form of an interest-bearing FDR.

¶21

It is stated that the petitioner will cooperate in the investigation and appear before the IO as and when summoned by him.

¶22

Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25, 000/- with one surety of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/IO/SHO concerned, further subject to the condition that the petitioner will join investigation as and when directed, provide relevant documents as sought by IO, and not influence any witness/complainant/victim or tamper with evidence of the case.

¶23

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Pending applications (if any) are disposed of as infructuous.

¶24

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶25

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶26

JULY 23, 2024/sm

¶27

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:51:45

Bindeshwari Poddar v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bindeshwari Poddar v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sh. Mofid Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

MD Asghar Vs State (Nct) of Delhi

Pawan Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Nitesh Singh Vs Archana Rawat

Kareena and Anr. Vs Commisioner of Police and Ors.

Smt Chandni & Anr. Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Ors.